Memes: The New Form Of Evolution

Who are we, where did we come from, and where are we going?

It’s a com­plex, three part ques­tion that we may never be able to fully answer. We do, how­ever, get closer every day. We build things. We revise them, and build them bet­ter. We make art to express our­selves, and wage war to defend our­selves. The world today is grow­ing rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent than the world of the ancients — and even the world of our Amer­i­can pio­neers. If one were to look at the charts and graphs sci­en­tists have devel­oped to demon­strate our ever increas­ing tech­no­log­i­cal prowess, they may find them­selves star­tled and afraid. The charts are climb­ing through the roof, shift­ing towards an expo­nen­tial trend of growth. Some argue that the Dar­win­ian mode of genetic evo­lu­tion is being replaced by a new form of evo­lu­tion dubbed Memetic Evo­lu­tion. Memes are human habits –art, music, lit­er­a­ture, and all other facets of our cul­ture. And our memes, it seems, are copy­ing them­selves at an alarm­ing rate.

The time it takes to com­mu­ni­cate a thought from one human being to another is shrink­ing expo­nen­tially. The activ­i­ties of writ­ing let­ters and send­ing telegrams have been replaced by the newer, faster meth­ods of email and text mes­sag­ing. What took a mat­ter of weeks if not months a hun­dred years ago now takes a mat­ter of min­utes if not sec­onds. If one were to extrap­o­late that trend of growth into the future, surely in the next hun­dred years it seems that we may become able to com­mu­ni­cate instan­ta­neously, even telepathically.

Yet, in this human frenzy of growth and explo­ration, we have to occa­sion­ally stop and smell the roses. How did we get here in the first place? Why were humans blessed with the gift of knowl­edge, and the poor chim­panzee left to poke around in the dirt?

Granted, some have argued that chim­panzees and ele­phants exhibit traits of self aware­ness and con­scious­ness. This was deter­mined by a mir­ror test, in which a mark­ing was made on the animal’s face, and con­se­quently shown its own reflec­tion. If the ani­mal imme­di­ately began groom­ing the mark­ing, sci­en­tists decided that it must be aware of itself. Yet are chim­panzees aware that humans are supe­rior to them as a species? Do they regard us as we may regard aliens or reli­gious fig­ures, as supreme beings? “Oh dang, a human is com­ing, I bet­ter act busy, and make it look like I’m doing some­thing impor­tant.” Regard­less of their inner per­cep­tions, all ani­mals except humans lack the men­tal syn­tax required for a com­plex lin­gual sys­tem. We are able to com­mu­ni­cate knowl­edge, infor­ma­tion, thoughts, feel­ings, and emo­tions to one another through our lan­guages. Yet, how did we get this way? Why are we the cho­sen ones, blessed with the power to pon­der life, time, space and God? Why are we the cursed ones, forced to ques­tion our own exis­tence and pur­pose on this planet, in this universe?

Our ances­tors first began mak­ing music and art some 40,000 years ago. Was this a result of some divine entity impart­ing its wis­dom into our souls? Prob­a­bly not. Most researchers have come to agree that such a change took place over thou­sands if not hun­dreds of thou­sands of years worth of genetic muta­tions. Was it the fact that our brains grew to be much larger than our pre­de­ces­sors? That was also not the case. Nean­derthals had a sim­i­lar sized brain as the Cro Magnon man, yet dis­played very lit­tle cul­ture. The Cro Magnon man per­formed many rit­u­als when one of their loved ones died. They places thou­sands of beads into the grave, and spent a large amount of time prepar­ing the cer­e­mony. Nean­derthals, on the other hand, sim­ply chucked the dead body into a pit. It seems that they had much less regard and under­stand­ing of life in this regard. They did not exhibit any signs of art, music, or any cul­ture for that mat­ter com­pared to the Cro Magnon man.

So then, what was it that set us apart? Why did we ascend to a higher state of exis­tence com­pared to our ani­mal neigh­bors? Per­haps it was not the actual size of our brains, but the wiring that gave us knowl­edge. Hunt­ing was prob­a­bly the pri­mary rea­son we invented tools and com­mu­ni­ca­tion. We designed, built, and redesigned stone tools until they gave us effec­tive results. Then, we used meth­ods of com­mu­ni­ca­tion to impart this knowl­edge to our descen­dants. Then, while hunt­ing, we devel­oped sig­nals and signs to aid in the kill. Thus, we began to devise hunt­ing plans, and tac­tics. We began to work together. This would have even­tu­ally become lan­guage as we know it, when our first vocal­iza­tions could be heard echo­ing through­out the ancient land­scape. A ver­bal lan­guage would have greatly sped up the com­mu­ni­ca­tion process. That would have in turn allowed for more effi­cient hunt­ing and gath­er­ing prac­tices, as more knowl­edge would have been con­veyed in a shorter amount of time. This would have resulted in more free time, which would have allowed hob­bies like bead mak­ing and art to become commonplace.

Thus, the birth of cul­ture. Bead mak­ing could have led to a value sys­tem, where beads were traded for goods and ser­vices. As time went on, our ances­tors may have found gold and sil­ver, and traded those. Money is born. The more money an indi­vid­ual had, the more power was asso­ci­ated with that per­son. Now we start get­ting into wars to gain more power, more con­trol over land and hunt­ing areas. Peo­ple start to make more and more art and music so that they can for­get about the wars, and the pain of lost loved ones. They may have found that while they were mak­ing music or art that time seemed to slow down, and they were able to con­nect with some hid­den force that felt eter­nal, and more real than real­ity itself. For in those fleet­ing moments of cre­ativ­ity, they were becom­ing eter­nal by cre­at­ing some­thing that would live on long after they were gone. These ances­tors of ours could con­nect with one another in ways the phys­i­cal world could not have allowed them to in the past. Unbe­knownst to them, they were build­ing the frame­work of what would some­day become soci­ety itself — a net­work of thought and culture.

Today, this net­work is more present than ever, and grow­ing rapidly. Even though bio­log­i­cally we may be the same as we were some 50,000 years ago, our minds have expanded out into the uni­verse, and deep into our own souls. As a race, we have become aware of our own lim­i­ta­tions — time, space, and our­selves. And as we tire­lessly work to break through these bound­aries, we may not real­ize how sim­i­lar the act of build­ing a space shut­tle is to build­ing a stone axe. They are both tools we use to advance our­selves, and now more than ever, it feels as though we are on the verge of another men­tal big bang. Just as our ances­tors broke through the bar­rier sep­a­rat­ing action from speech, we may be on the verge of break­ing through the bar­rier that sep­a­rated our bod­ies from our souls. For some­day soon, we may truly get the chance to meet our true selves and shake our own hands. Some­day soon, we may decide not to be human, or any­thing, at all.

 

We’re Pretty Much All Tripping, All the Time


Watch Beau Lotto’s talk above on opti­cal illu­sions and how infor­ma­tion can dif­fer depend­ing on perception.

Writ­ten by Ben Thomas

The year was 1943, and the Pen­ta­gon had a prob­lem. They’d poured mil­lions of dol­lars into a new voice encryp­tion sys­tem — dubbed the “X Sys­tem” — but no one was cer­tain how secure it was. So the top brass called in Claude Shan­non to ana­lyze their code and — if all went well — to prove that it was math­e­mat­i­cally unbreakable.

Shan­non was a new breed of math­e­mati­cian: A spe­cial­ist in what’s known today as infor­ma­tion the­ory. To Shan­non and his fel­low the­o­rists, infor­ma­tion was some­thing sep­a­rate from the let­ters, num­bers and facts it rep­re­sented. Instead, it was some­thing more abstract; more math­e­mat­i­cal: in a word, it wasnon-redundancy.

As Beau Lotto explains in his pre­sen­ta­tion, we’re hal­lu­ci­nat­ing real­ity all the time — but we only take notice when our hal­lu­ci­na­tions fail to make accu­rate pre­dic­tions.– Ben Thomas

Take, for exam­ple, the sequence of let­ters spelling out “Let’s crack the codes.” It’s got a high level of redun­dancy — not all its let­ters are essen­tial for get­ting its mes­sage across. As long as you’ve got some prac­tice read­ing Eng­lish, you can look at a shorter, less-redundant sequence like “Lt’s crck th cdes” and fill in the miss­ing sounds. Along the same lines, Hebrew and Ara­bic speak­ers can read the vowel-free writ­ten forms of their lan­guages just fine. Our brains are sur­pris­ingly tal­ented at pick­ing up pat­terns, fill­ing in blanks, and ignor­ing redun­dant data — only when we’re uncer­tain about how to fill in a blank does infor­ma­tion become… well, informative.

Shannon’s non-redundancy idea isn’t just handy for crack­ing codes, though — today, it’s respon­si­ble for most of what you see on the Inter­net. JPEG image com­pres­sion, for instance, throws out most of an image’s data, and we rarely notice anything’s miss­ing — our brains’ visual sys­tem smooths out the rough spots. Same goes for MP3 com­pres­sion, and for the Flash video encod­ing used on YouTube. Ever since Shannon’s day, infor­ma­tion the­o­rists have been refin­ing their tech­niques, drilling closer and closer to the bare min­i­mum of infor­ma­tion required to con­vince us we’re not miss­ing any­thing. (You might say those ancient Hebrew and Ara­bic scribes were a few thou­sand years ahead of their time.)

2012 11 11 Felis silvestris silvestris small gradual decrease of quality Were Pretty Much All Tripping, All the Time

Data com­pres­sion isn’t just dig­i­tal, either — in fact, it’s hard­wired into our brains, from the neu­rons up. As Beau Lotto shows us in his TEDTalk above, every color we per­ceive is depen­dent on its con­text: What other col­ors sur­round it? Is it in light or in shadow? How’s the light tinted? And what’s true for light holds true for sound, too — as I explain in this arti­cle, your brain gets so pumped up about rhythm that it actu­ally hal­lu­ci­nates miss­ing beats. Oh, and if you’re in the mood for some­thing extra weird today, check out Oliver Sacks’ TEDTalk on Charles Bon­net syn­drome – a brain dis­or­der that makes peo­ple hal­lu­ci­nate vivid scenes from tiny stray nerve signals.

In light of all this, it’s hard to escape the inven­tor Ray Kurzweil’scon­clu­sion: “We don’t actu­ally see things [at all]; we hal­lu­ci­nate them in detail from low-resolution cues.” As Beau Lotto explains in his pre­sen­ta­tion, we’re hal­lu­ci­nat­ing real­ity all the time — but we only take notice when our hal­lu­ci­na­tions fail to make accu­rate pre­dic­tions; when we think we’re cer­tain of some­thing that’s actu­ally not so cer­tain, and our brains have to hunt down new infor­ma­tion in order to make bet­ter predictions.

Claude Shan­non once said, “Infor­ma­tion is the res­o­lu­tion of uncer­tainty.” The more cer­tain we are in our hal­lu­ci­na­tions, the less infor­ma­tion we think we need — and the less open to new infor­ma­tion we become. Beau Lotto fin­ishes his talk on a sim­i­lar note. “Only through uncer­tainty,” he says, “is there poten­tial for understanding.”

Luck­ily for the Allies in World War II, Shan­non had just the right kind of under­stand­ing for the job. After prov­ing the Pentagon’s X Sys­tem math­e­mat­i­cally uncrack­able, he helped lay the ground­work for the next gen­er­a­tion of mil­i­tary codes. His most endur­ing legacy, though, isn’t the codes he cre­ated, but the idea behind them: Only in uncer­tainty do we real­ize information’s value.

Girls Get Naked for PETA’s Anti Meat Protest at Santa Monica Farmers Market

20120512 134444 Girls Get Naked for PETAs Anti Meat Protest at Santa Monica Farmers Market

It’s What’s For Dinner.

A bunch of girls got naked, cov­ered them­selves in blood, and wrapped them­selves up in meat pack­ag­ing at the 3rd St. Prom­e­nade in protest of eat­ing meat for PETA.

enhanced buzz 14954 1296670473 11 Girls Get Naked for PETAs Anti Meat Protest at Santa Monica Farmers Market

I’d Still Eat It

 

The Lavish Jungle Yacht by International Harvester

BY  ON MARCH 22, 2012

IH jungle yacht 700x433 The Lavish Jungle Yacht by International Harvester

The Jun­gle Yacht by Inter­na­tional Har­vester was cre­ated for and used by Ital­ian explorer Com­man­der Attilio Gatti and his wife, who both trav­eled exten­sively to the African Congo. Accord­ing to Hem­mings Blog, he used the Jun­gle Yacht as a deluxe apart­ment “for his 1937–1940 (his 10th) and 1947 (his 11th) expe­di­tions” and “equipped them quite lavishly.”

1106769228 f89cd6d506 o The Lavish Jungle Yacht by International Harvester

jungleyachtadv 530x700 The Lavish Jungle Yacht by International Harvester

cocktails in the Congo The Lavish Jungle Yacht by International Harvester

0305002727 l The Lavish Jungle Yacht by International Harvester

The bed­room

0305002725 l The Lavish Jungle Yacht by International Harvester

The liv­in­groom

via Tel­star Logis­tics and Hooni­verse