Moving At The Speed Of Drone: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

There are some inter­est­ing tech­nolo­gies com­ing into the spot­light as of late, and when observed indi­vid­u­ally, they are quite impres­sive. But when you take a step back and see where all of this is headed, the out­look for human­ity can appear breath­tak­ing. Yet, it only take a cou­ple mouse clicks to have that techno-optimism destroyed. A good exam­ple is the com­ing drone revolution.

Drones are essen­tially fly­ing robots, and they have been get­ting alot of neg­a­tive press lately, what with all the acci­den­tal killing of civil­ians and fears of a total­i­tar­ian police-state being able to spy on every­one and every­thing 24/7. Take this Drag­on­fly Drone some­one spot­ted at a fam­ily barbecue:

The tooth­paste is out of the tube: it is now pos­si­ble for some­one to see every­thing you do. But wait! There’s more! Some­one decided to use the sim­ple for­mula “Drone + Gun = Great Idea” and build an autonomous, Ipad-controlled fly­ing machine gun that lit­er­ally self-destructs if it gets shot down.

Wel­come to hell, right? How does one defend them­selves against some­thing like that? A per­sonal laser defense sys­tem? Imag­ine 100, or even 10,000 of those fly­ing into your city.

How­ever, there is some good news. Farm­ers have started using drones to view crops, sav­ing money on expen­sive sur­veil­lance ser­vices nor­mally con­ducted by plane. But imag­ine how much more effi­cient an army of farm­ing drones would be. You could plant crops in places you can’t get to, sched­ule water­ing and main­te­nance, har­vest food autonomously, and even have it deliv­ered to a customer’s doorstep. Super­mar­kets will be a thing of the past. Also, think about construction.

Drones will allow for the con­struc­tion and demo­li­tion of a build­ing within days, if not hours. Com­bine this with the ben­e­fits 3D print­ing will pro­vide, and it is easy to imag­ine an entire city migrat­ing to fol­low resources.

Here’s where I’m going with all this: We are going to need to com­pletely over­haul the eco­nomic sys­tem. What is going to hap­pen when China begins to use robots because it is eco­nom­i­cally fea­si­ble to do so? Can our econ­omy sup­port ONE BILLION unem­ployed peo­ple? What hap­pens to the con­struc­tion work­ers, farm­ers, truck dri­vers, and other assorted ser­vice peo­ple who will be sud­denly unem­ployed? We are head­ing towards a post-scarcity soci­ety with a scarcity-driven economy.

There is a solu­tion, how­ever. Eco­nomic mod­els like the Resource Based Econ­omy Prin­ci­ple dic­tate a world cen­tered around a vast resource man­age­ment sys­tem, a liv­ing wage, using the high­est lev­els of tech­nol­ogy avail­able to elim­i­nate cor­rupt profit mod­els. God for­bid any of us be judged by how good we are as human beings and what we con­tribute to society.

These tech­nolo­gies need to hap­pen like, yes­ter­day. Why? Because there’s a great big Brother eye­ing the kill­switch; who is quickly real­iz­ing he will soon be obso­lete, and I don’t think he’s going quietly.

 

 

Memes: The New Form Of Evolution

Who are we, where did we come from, and where are we going?

It’s a com­plex, three part ques­tion that we may never be able to fully answer. We do, how­ever, get closer every day. We build things. We revise them, and build them bet­ter. We make art to express our­selves, and wage war to defend our­selves. The world today is grow­ing rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent than the world of the ancients — and even the world of our Amer­i­can pio­neers. If one were to look at the charts and graphs sci­en­tists have devel­oped to demon­strate our ever increas­ing tech­no­log­i­cal prowess, they may find them­selves star­tled and afraid. The charts are climb­ing through the roof, shift­ing towards an expo­nen­tial trend of growth. Some argue that the Dar­win­ian mode of genetic evo­lu­tion is being replaced by a new form of evo­lu­tion dubbed Memetic Evo­lu­tion. Memes are human habits –art, music, lit­er­a­ture, and all other facets of our cul­ture. And our memes, it seems, are copy­ing them­selves at an alarm­ing rate.

The time it takes to com­mu­ni­cate a thought from one human being to another is shrink­ing expo­nen­tially. The activ­i­ties of writ­ing let­ters and send­ing telegrams have been replaced by the newer, faster meth­ods of email and text mes­sag­ing. What took a mat­ter of weeks if not months a hun­dred years ago now takes a mat­ter of min­utes if not sec­onds. If one were to extrap­o­late that trend of growth into the future, surely in the next hun­dred years it seems that we may become able to com­mu­ni­cate instan­ta­neously, even telepathically.

Yet, in this human frenzy of growth and explo­ration, we have to occa­sion­ally stop and smell the roses. How did we get here in the first place? Why were humans blessed with the gift of knowl­edge, and the poor chim­panzee left to poke around in the dirt?

Granted, some have argued that chim­panzees and ele­phants exhibit traits of self aware­ness and con­scious­ness. This was deter­mined by a mir­ror test, in which a mark­ing was made on the animal’s face, and con­se­quently shown its own reflec­tion. If the ani­mal imme­di­ately began groom­ing the mark­ing, sci­en­tists decided that it must be aware of itself. Yet are chim­panzees aware that humans are supe­rior to them as a species? Do they regard us as we may regard aliens or reli­gious fig­ures, as supreme beings? “Oh dang, a human is com­ing, I bet­ter act busy, and make it look like I’m doing some­thing impor­tant.” Regard­less of their inner per­cep­tions, all ani­mals except humans lack the men­tal syn­tax required for a com­plex lin­gual sys­tem. We are able to com­mu­ni­cate knowl­edge, infor­ma­tion, thoughts, feel­ings, and emo­tions to one another through our lan­guages. Yet, how did we get this way? Why are we the cho­sen ones, blessed with the power to pon­der life, time, space and God? Why are we the cursed ones, forced to ques­tion our own exis­tence and pur­pose on this planet, in this universe?

Our ances­tors first began mak­ing music and art some 40,000 years ago. Was this a result of some divine entity impart­ing its wis­dom into our souls? Prob­a­bly not. Most researchers have come to agree that such a change took place over thou­sands if not hun­dreds of thou­sands of years worth of genetic muta­tions. Was it the fact that our brains grew to be much larger than our pre­de­ces­sors? That was also not the case. Nean­derthals had a sim­i­lar sized brain as the Cro Magnon man, yet dis­played very lit­tle cul­ture. The Cro Magnon man per­formed many rit­u­als when one of their loved ones died. They places thou­sands of beads into the grave, and spent a large amount of time prepar­ing the cer­e­mony. Nean­derthals, on the other hand, sim­ply chucked the dead body into a pit. It seems that they had much less regard and under­stand­ing of life in this regard. They did not exhibit any signs of art, music, or any cul­ture for that mat­ter com­pared to the Cro Magnon man.

So then, what was it that set us apart? Why did we ascend to a higher state of exis­tence com­pared to our ani­mal neigh­bors? Per­haps it was not the actual size of our brains, but the wiring that gave us knowl­edge. Hunt­ing was prob­a­bly the pri­mary rea­son we invented tools and com­mu­ni­ca­tion. We designed, built, and redesigned stone tools until they gave us effec­tive results. Then, we used meth­ods of com­mu­ni­ca­tion to impart this knowl­edge to our descen­dants. Then, while hunt­ing, we devel­oped sig­nals and signs to aid in the kill. Thus, we began to devise hunt­ing plans, and tac­tics. We began to work together. This would have even­tu­ally become lan­guage as we know it, when our first vocal­iza­tions could be heard echo­ing through­out the ancient land­scape. A ver­bal lan­guage would have greatly sped up the com­mu­ni­ca­tion process. That would have in turn allowed for more effi­cient hunt­ing and gath­er­ing prac­tices, as more knowl­edge would have been con­veyed in a shorter amount of time. This would have resulted in more free time, which would have allowed hob­bies like bead mak­ing and art to become commonplace.

Thus, the birth of cul­ture. Bead mak­ing could have led to a value sys­tem, where beads were traded for goods and ser­vices. As time went on, our ances­tors may have found gold and sil­ver, and traded those. Money is born. The more money an indi­vid­ual had, the more power was asso­ci­ated with that per­son. Now we start get­ting into wars to gain more power, more con­trol over land and hunt­ing areas. Peo­ple start to make more and more art and music so that they can for­get about the wars, and the pain of lost loved ones. They may have found that while they were mak­ing music or art that time seemed to slow down, and they were able to con­nect with some hid­den force that felt eter­nal, and more real than real­ity itself. For in those fleet­ing moments of cre­ativ­ity, they were becom­ing eter­nal by cre­at­ing some­thing that would live on long after they were gone. These ances­tors of ours could con­nect with one another in ways the phys­i­cal world could not have allowed them to in the past. Unbe­knownst to them, they were build­ing the frame­work of what would some­day become soci­ety itself — a net­work of thought and culture.

Today, this net­work is more present than ever, and grow­ing rapidly. Even though bio­log­i­cally we may be the same as we were some 50,000 years ago, our minds have expanded out into the uni­verse, and deep into our own souls. As a race, we have become aware of our own lim­i­ta­tions — time, space, and our­selves. And as we tire­lessly work to break through these bound­aries, we may not real­ize how sim­i­lar the act of build­ing a space shut­tle is to build­ing a stone axe. They are both tools we use to advance our­selves, and now more than ever, it feels as though we are on the verge of another men­tal big bang. Just as our ances­tors broke through the bar­rier sep­a­rat­ing action from speech, we may be on the verge of break­ing through the bar­rier that sep­a­rated our bod­ies from our souls. For some­day soon, we may truly get the chance to meet our true selves and shake our own hands. Some­day soon, we may decide not to be human, or any­thing, at all.

 

Making Friends We Never Talk To: The Dangerous Social Effects Of Social Media

Sherry Turkle was recently inter­viewed by NPR on the pod­cast “Do We Need Humans?” with other fel­low TED speak­ers.  What struck me as fas­ci­nat­ing about this pod­cast is that she touches on a sub­ject all of us are aware of but rarely talk about: Social media and rela­tion­ships. More impor­tantly, the social effects of social media. How is tech­nol­ogy mak­ing us feel con­nected to each other, and is this a good thing?

080411 rg RobotSealParo 03 Making Friends We Never Talk To: The Dangerous Social Effects Of Social Media

Wis­dom falls on deaf ears: An elderly woman talks to a robotic baby seal for comfort.

Sherry begins by explain­ing some­thing she saw one day that changed every­thing she believed. She was watch­ing an elderly patient at a hos­pi­tal inter­act­ing with a robot. It looked like a baby harp seal, and it had big, cute eye­lashes. It responded to her lan­guage, and cheered her up. It com­forted her. The older woman had lost a child, which could explain her long­ing for some­thing to hold again. It made her feel under­stood. Sherry couldn’t believe how well she was respond­ing to this robot, and real­ized the pos­si­bil­i­ties of this robot’s application.

I felt pro­foundly depressed.  This was a tremen­dous emo­tional turn­ing point in my research,” says Sherry.  She is now very wor­ried about where this is all headed, and dur­ing her TED talk “Con­nected, but Alone?” she described it best:

I felt myself at the cold, dark cen­ter of a per­fect storm, in which we expect more from a tech­nol­ogy rela­tion­ship than we expect from each other.  I believe it is because tech­nol­ogy appeals to us most where we are most vul­ner­a­ble.  We are lonely, but afraid of inti­macy.  We are design­ing social net­works that help us feel con­nected in ways we can com­fort­ably con­trol.  But we aren’t com­fort­able, and we aren’t in control. We are cheer­ing on this emo­tional con­nec­tion to a machine, but why are we out­sourc­ing what defines us as people?”

When Sherry gave her TED talk the year before, how­ever, it was like a pub­lic con­fes­sional — because the year before, she told us how amaz­ing robots will become.

So what changed her mind?

I have inter­viewed hun­dreds and hun­dreds of peo­ple about their plugged in lives.  These lit­tle devices are so psy­cho­log­i­cally pow­er­ful, they not only change what we do, they change what we are.  Some of the things we do with our devices are things we would have found odd only a few years ago.  Peo­ple text dur­ing com­pany board room meet­ings.  Peo­ple have talked about the impor­tant skill of eye con­tact while you are tex­ting.  We even text at funer­als.  We remove our­selves from our grief and our revery, and go into our phones. Why does this mat­ter? Because I think we are set­ting our­selves up for trou­ble, not only in how we relate to each other, but how we relate with our­selves.  Peo­ple want to be  every­where at the same time.  The thing that mat­ters most to peo­ple is con­trol of where they put their attention.”

Texting Too Much Making Friends We Never Talk To: The Dangerous Social Effects Of Social Media

So close, yet so far away.

But what if some­one is so lonely, they must resort to a device to help them feel bet­ter?  Cer­tainly there are peo­ple who would oth­er­wise be com­pletely iso­lated from the out­side world with­out tech­nol­ogy.  Sherry under­stands that there are inher­ent ben­e­fits to these tech­nolo­gies, but in the future, why would we want to do that to our­selves?  Why would we inten­tion­ally con­struct false relationships?

When we con­struct robots, we are chang­ing our­selves.  We must real­ize the needs we are serv­ing and become aware of what these needs are.  Sherry wants to hear a more artic­u­lated con­ver­sa­tion about these human needs.  “I always hear TED talks that talk about this and always end with peo­ple say­ing ‘we will become more human’ if we let these robots advance.  I’m not so sure.  Why do we want that old woman talk­ing to a robot?  She deserves to have peo­ple around, and we need to hear the sto­ries of her life to learn from her.”

Tech­nol­ogy is mak­ing the bid to rede­fine human con­nec­tion.  How we care for each other and our­selves.  How we deter­mine our val­ues and our direc­tion.  We have every oppor­tu­nity ahead of us, and we have every­thing we need to start — each other.  We have the great­est chance of suc­cess if we rec­og­nize our vul­ner­a­bil­ity; that we lis­ten when tech­nol­ogy says it will take some­thing com­pli­cated and make it sim­pler.  Our fan­tasies are cost­ing us, and we need to find ways that tech­nol­ogy can lead us back to our own lives and bod­ies.  Lets talk about how we can use dig­i­tal tech­nol­ogy, the tech­nol­ogy of our dreams, to make this life a life we can love.”

We must find a bal­ance between our tech­no­logic and the per­sonal worlds as the lines increas­ingly blur. Social media pro­files still leave much to the imag­i­na­tion, yet can pro­vide more instan­ta­neous infor­ma­tion about a per­son than an aver­age 5 min­utes of small talk. Google Glass — which allows one to share videos, text, make calls and browse the web through the user’s eye — is an emerg­ing tech­nol­ogy that may prove ben­e­fi­cial in estab­lish­ing the phys­i­cal and internet-based demar­ca­tions … by com­pletely elim­i­nat­ing those bound­aries and turn­ing an indi­vid­ual into a breath­ing, liv­ing embod­i­ment of the inter­net. You could say we are becom­ing the inter­net. Or the inter­net is becom­ing us. Whichever you choose, there is a new age of inter­ac­tion upon us, and we most cer­tainly will have our share of grow­ing pains. Perhaps some new device like Google Glass will help peo­ple learn to truly see through each other’s eyes…But most likely, you’ll just use it to watch the Lak­ers game dur­ing your next din­ner date.

Do you think there are more pros or cons to social media? SHARE BELOW

 

About Sherry Turkle

Sherry Turkle stud­ies how tech­nol­ogy is shap­ing our mod­ern rela­tion­ships with oth­ers, with our­selves, with it. Described as the “Mar­garet Mead of dig­i­tal cul­ture,” Turkle is cur­rently focus­ing on the world of social media and socia­ble robots. In her most recent book, Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Tech­nol­ogy and Less From Each Other, Turkle argues that the social media we encounter on a daily basis are con­fronting us with a moment of temptation.

Drawn by the illu­sion of com­pan­ion­ship with­out the demands of inti­macy, we con­fuse post­ings and online shar­ing with authen­tic com­mu­ni­ca­tion. We are drawn to sac­ri­fice con­ver­sa­tion for mere con­nec­tion. But Turkle sug­gests that dig­i­tal tech­nol­ogy is still in its infancy and there is ample time for us to reshape how we build it and use it. She is a pro­fes­sor in the Pro­gram in Sci­ence, Tech­nol­ogy and Soci­ety at MIT and the founder and direc­tor of the MIT Ini­tia­tive on Tech­nol­ogy and Self.